Biotechnological Applications of Yeasts to Move Society Towards A Circular Economy

Biotechnology and Environmentalism| Petra Pocock

Yeast, or Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been a part of human culture and food for centuries, dating back to ancient Egypt [1], [2]. Common applications include domestic brewing, baking, alcohol fermentation, insect control, preventing food spoilage, composting, and cosmetics [3]. Some examples of biotechnical applications of yeast are metabolite and protein production, vaccine discovery, pathology research, and clinical research [4], [5].

Multiple connections exist between biotechnology and a circular economy, such as bio-based plastics, biofuels, platform chemicals, specialty chemicals, and more [6]. While the concept of a circular economy is criticised for having varied definitions, J. Kirchherr [7] concluded that “circular economy” most commonly describes an economy based on prioritising sustainable development and economic prosperity through endorsing “reduce, reuse, and recycle activities.”

The connection between yeast and economy is well highlighted by the production of bioplastics from genetically engineered yeasts [8]. Traditional, unsustainable methods of plastic production from polymers such as olefins, also known as alkenes, are non-recyclable, manufactured from materials such as petroleum, and thus reliant on fossil fuels [9]. This is not a sustainable practice, as only 15% of total plastic waste is recycled while 400 million tonnes per year of plastic are produced on a global scale [10].

Studies of organisms like S. cerevisiae provide insight into the biology of similar organisms within the same genera or family. Useful examples include research on other fungi species which have evolved to utilise synthetic chemicals such as the PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoates) and PHB (polyhydroxybutyrate) polyesters produced by bacteria [11]. This can be utilised in our global economy via the integration of these biodegradable polyesters as substitutes for petroleum-based plastics, supporting a circular culture of reducing and recycling.

Yeast is valuable due to its non-pathogenic nature, which prevents accidental contamination of experimental products and tools. This supports the generation of accurate data and faster solutions to global research challenges, potentially within medicinal and pharmaceutical research [12], [13]. Yeast’s environmental tolerance to various stressors, including ethanol inhibition, high temperatures, and osmotic pressure fluctuations, enhances its utility in biotechnological applications [14], [15]. Additionally, the majority of yeast species, including S. cerevisiae, grow rapidly, enabling faster and more accurate results within gene expression research, as many generations can be studied [16]. Yeast provides biocatalytic qualities, facilitation, rapid conclusion, and time efficiency [12-17]

Genetic modification is incredibly useful for filtering unfavourable qualities of yeast for biotechnological applications, such as the differing compound ratios between species, and property-altering compounds [18]. For example, the engineered removal of the Gly1250Ser (1250S) point mutation increases the amount of ethyl caproate, meaning that the yeast used in the production of Japanese Sake gives a pleasant apple flavour to the drink [19]. The cultural importance of biotechnology to society is dependent on public perception. Public familiarity creates acceptance and enables the integration of science with modern society [19].

Multiple methods of improving yeast strains for biotechnological experimentation exist, two of which are mutagenesis and metabolic engineering [18].

Mutagenesis is the genetic alteration of yeast to induce new mutations to original DNA [20]. Methods include mutagens like nitroguanidine, ethyl methanesulfonate, and synthetic ultraviolet radiation [21-23]. These mutations are designed to improve desirable traits such as increased productivity, higher stress tolerance, and varying speeds of metabolism [24]. It can implement a significant range of mutations within the yeast genome [24]. Weaknesses can include a low specificity of mutations induced, and therefore a high likelihood of non-beneficial mutations occurring. The challenge of site-directed mutagenesis makes studying specific genes or genetic and phenotypic traits challenging and better supported by other methods [25].

Metabolic engineering is the targeted modification of the metabolic pathways of an organism that alters its cellular metabolism and phenotypic traits, through the use of engineered enzymes, introduction of new genes, and/or altering metabolic pathways [26]. Metabolic engineering improves the qualities of differing organisms, including S. cerevisiae, which has been crucial to the scientific community's knowledge of biochemistry, physiology, and genetics [27]. In this example, altering the metabolic pathways of yeast has multiple strengths and weaknesses in its biotechnological application [28]. Strengths include the extreme accuracy of the technology, in contrast to mutagenesis [29]. In addition, the high predictability of metabolic engineering combined with the fully sequenced yeast genome allows for consistent experimental results. The predictable and specific nature of metabolic engineering allows for the industrial-scale control of bioprocesses, which would strongly support the integration of biotechnology within a modern economy [30]. However, while metabolically engineered S. cerevisiae provides a medium for further development of technical scientific methods and tools [27], some weaknesses of this method exist. Metabolic engineering requires technical skills, as well as knowledge of the metabolism, cellular genetics, and physiology of the target species. Cell survival can often limit the insertion of mutations. Finally, the challenge of human error and unintended consequences is important to account for [31].

Mutagenesis and metabolic engineering are both genetic modifications with different applications. While mutagenesis is cost-effective, covers a wide range of genes, and successfully creates genetic diversity, it cannot provide the precision of metabolic engineering, which allows for highly technical alterations of yeast for biotechnological purposes. The decision to use one over the other comes down to the desired outcome, financial ability, and logistical constraints.

Yeast’s multifaceted applications in biotechnology, including metabolic engineering and mutagenesis, contribute to a significantly more sustainable economy. By leveraging yeast’s adaptability, we can enhance innovation and support a shift towards more environmentally friendly practices.

[1] T. Aouizerat et al., “Isolation and Characterization of Live Yeast Cells from Ancient Clay Vessels,” Bio-protocol, vol. 10, no.1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.3473.

[2] A. Patel, U. Rova, P. Christakopoulos, and L. Matsakas, “From yeast to biotechnology,” Bioengineering, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 751, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120751.

[3] P. Howitt, “Mushrooms and Yeast: The implications of technological progress for Canada’s Economic growth,” Social Science Research Network, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2657623.

[4] D. Porro, M. Sauer, P. Branduardi, and D. Mattanovich, “Recombinant protein production in yeasts,” Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 245–260, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1385/mb:31:3:245.

[5] Y. Tan, L. Chen, K. Li, B. Lou, Y. Liu, and Z. Liu, “Yeast as carrier for drug delivery and vaccine construction,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 346, pp. 358–379, Jun. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.032.

[6] F.-L. Zhang et al., “Engineering yeast cell factories to produce biodegradable plastics and their monomers: Current status and prospects,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 68, p. 108222, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108222.

[7] J. Kirchherr, D. Reike, and M. Hekkert, “Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 127, pp. 221–232, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j. resconrec.2017.09.005.

[8] S. S. Ali et al., “Engineered yeast for the production of bioplastics,” in Elsevier eBooks, 2023, pp. 277–296. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-95449-5.00017-5.

[9] K. Harding, J. Dennis, H. Vonblottnitz, and S. Harrison, “Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 57–66, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.012.

[10] W. U. Eze, R. Umunakwe, H. C. Obasi, M. I. Ugbaja, C. C. Uche, and I. C. Madufor, “Plastics waste management: A review of pyrolysis technology,” Clean Technologies and Recycling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–69, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3934/ctr.2021003.

[11] D. Y. Kim and Y. H. Rhee, “Biodegradation of microbial and synthetic polyesters by fungi,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 300–308, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1205-3.

[12] E. A. Johnson and C. Echavarri-Erasun, “Yeast Biotechnology,” in Elsevier eBooks, 2011, pp. 21–44. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-52149-1.00003-3.

[13] E. Abatenh, B. Gizaw, and Z. Tsegaye, “Contamination in a microbiological laboratory,” International Journal of Research Studies in Biosciences, vol. 6, no. 4, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.20431/2349-0365.0604002.

[14] A. P. Gasch et al., “Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 4241–4257, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241.

[15] X. Q. Zhao and F. W. Bai, “Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 23–30, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.05.001.

[16] M. J. Brauer et al., “Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 352–367, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0779.

[17] K. Klier, “Structure and function of real catalysts,” Applications of Surface Science, vol. 19, no. 1–4, pp. 267–297, Nov. 1984, doi: 10.1016/0378-5963(84)90066-7.

[18] J. Steensels, T. Snoek, E. Meersman, M. P. Nicolino, K. Voordeckers, and K. J. Verstrepen, “Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 947–995, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12073.

[19] K. Aritomi et al., “Self-cloning yeast strains containing NovelFAS2Mutations produce a higher amount of ethyl caproate in Japanese sake,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 206–214, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.206.

[20] P. Anderson, “Chapter 2 Mutagenesis,” in Methods in cell biology, 1995, pp. 31–58. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61382-5.

[21] J. B. Guttenplan, “Mutagenesis by N-nitroso compounds: relationships to DNA adducts, DNA repair, and mutational efficiencies,” Mutation Research, vol. 233, no. 1–2, pp. 177–187, Nov.1990, doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(90)90161-v.

[22] H. Ikehata and T. Ono, “The mechanisms of UV mutagenesis,” Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 115–125, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1269/jrr.10175.

[23] G. A. Sega, “A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate,” Mutation Research. Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, vol. 134, no. 2–3, pp. 113–142, Sep. 1984, doi: 10.1016/01651110(84)90007-1.

[24] L. Wang, B. Li, S.-P. Wang, Z.-Y. Xia, M. Gou, and Y.-Q. Tang, “Improving multiple stress-tolerance of a flocculating industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain by random mutagenesis and hybridization,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 102, pp. 275–285, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.12.022.

[25] V. Stovicek, C. Holkenbrink, and I. Borodina, “CRISPR/Cas system for yeast genome engineering: advances and applications,” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 17, no. 5, May 2017, doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox030.

[26] J. Nielsen, “Metabolic engineering,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 263–283, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1007/s002530000511.

[27] E. Nevoigt, “Progress in Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 379–412, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00025-07.

[28] J. Lian, S. Mishra, and H. Zhao, “Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: New tools and their applications,” Metabolic Engineering, vol. 50, pp. 85–108, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.011.

[29] M. R. Antoniewicz, “A guide to metabolic flux analysis in metabolic engineering: Methods, tools and applications,” Metabolic Engineering, vol. 63, pp. 2–12, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.11.002.

[30] D. Jullesson, F. David, B. Pfleger, and J. Nielsen, “Impact of synthetic biology and metabolic engineering on industrial production of fine chemicals,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1395–1402, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.011.

[31] S. M. Weisberg, D. Badgio, and A. Chatterjee, “A CRISPR New World: Attitudes in the Public toward Innovations in Human Genetic Modification,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 5, May 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00117.

Petra is a 4th-year student in Biological Sciences and Science Communications, passionate about biology and the long-term applications of biotechnology towards climate change mitigation. Her personal interests include involvement in the UoA Student Chamber Orchestra, organisations dedicated to supporting women in STEM pathways and careers, and environmental conservation.

Petra Pocock - BSc, Biological Sciences, Science Communications