Measuring the speed of time
Quantum Physics| Experimental Physics| Alex Chapple
Recent breakthroughs create quantum logic clocks that don't lose nor gain a second over 33 billion years.
Amongst the beautiful mountainous scenery of the Rocky Mountains and the iconic Flatirons of Boulder, Colorado, sits a device that counts seconds better than almost any device on earth. It is the NIST-F2, the clock that was unveiled by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2014, which does not gain or lose a second in 300 million years (i.e., with an inaccuracy of approximately 10) [1]. To give some perspective, 300 million years ago the earth had one continent, the Pangea, and reptiles were just rising into dominance. The NIST-F2, alongside its predecessor NIST-F1, serves as the primary standard for civilian time in the US [2]. The International Atomic Time (TAI) is based on the readings combined from many of these high precision clocks worldwide. It is the basis of civilian time and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) [3].
It is hard to overstate the importance of clocks in our world. Contrary to the readers' current thoughts, clocks with an inaccuracy of 10 serve various purposes in our everyday lives. Accurate clocks are used to synchronise GPS systems, utilise radars for both commercial and military purposes, improve geodesy and metrology, timestamp financial transactions, and can even be used to confirm Einstein's theory of general relativity [4-6]. All of the above applications require a precise measurement of time to operate, and new applications of accurate clocks are realised frequently. At the launch of the NIST-F2, Steven Jefferts, the lead designer said, "If we've learned anything in the last 60 years of building atomic clocks, we've learnt that every time we build a better clock, somebody comes up with a use for it that you couldn't have foreseen" [1].
The most common clocks used for accurate timekeeping are known as atomic clocks, as they take advantage of the stable energy level structures of specific atoms. Atomic clocks arose several decades after the rapid establishment of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century when scientists started to understand the detailed structure of atoms. Lord Kelvin first suggested such a device in 1879¹, but the technology to realise them only came into prominence in the mid-twentieth century [7]. Much of the foundational work on atomic oscillations was laid out by Isador Rabi — a Nobel laureate in physics — in the 1930s and 40s [8,9]. Several laboratories in the UK and US started working on creating an atomic clock a decade later [7].
Atomic clocks work by exploiting the energy levels of atoms. The electrons that surround an atom have discrete energy levels and require a particular amount of energy for it to move to the next energy state. The amount of energy required to transition between energy levels is unique and consistent with each atom² [7,10-12]. This property plays an essential role in mitigating any manufacturing errors as every element is identical to one another. The basic principle behind atomic clocks is as follows.³ An ensemble of atoms is cooled to several milli-Kelvin (near absolute zero) in order to access its ground state energy level. The ensemble is then exposed to radiation at a frequency close to their resonant frequency — the frequency that excites the atom and transitions it to the next energy state (in this case, the first excited state). It is for this reason that we must ensure the initially prepared ensemble is in its ground state. A magnet filters out those atoms that are not excited, and the remaining atoms are fed into a detector. The detector then counts the number of excited atoms, and uses this information to adjust the frequency of the radiation until the maximum number of excited atoms is detected. This feedback control and these self-adjustments are what make atomic clocks so precise. The adjusted frequency is then counted by a separate device to keep track of the time elapsed.⁴ Figure 1 illustrates the general idea.
The most common element used in modern atomic clocks is the Cesium-133 atom [7]. Its heavy mass makes it slow and easier to confine, and its comparatively high resonant frequency makes for a more accurate measurement. In fact, the definition of the SI unit "second" is the duration of 91,926,317,70 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the hyperfine levels of the unperturbed ground state of the Cesium-133 atom [13]. Other common elements used are Hydrogen and Rubidium, though both weigh less and have lower resonant frequencies in their ground states.
The significance of the measurement of time can not be understated when almost all measurements we make are in some form compared to time. Until the mid-1990s, Cesium based atomic clocks reigned supreme in accuracy. Though most clocks used nowadays for government, commercial, and military purposes are still Cesium based (owing to its well-known stability and reliability), various research groups worldwide have realised clocks that have higher accuracies. Here we will explore two promising avenues in next-generation high-precision clocks, the first of which is the optical lattice clock.
Figure 1: Purple (Cyan) particles represent ground (excited) state Cesium atoms. Emitted atoms are exposed to the radiation of a particular frequency, after which a magnet removes all the remaining ground state atoms that were not excited in the process. A detector then counts the number of excited atoms and uses this information to fine-tune the radiation frequency until the maximum number of excited atoms is detected.
An optical lattice clock is created by using several lasers to produce a single or even multilevel egg carton-like potential that traps atoms in its valleys (see Figure 2 [15]). By using numerous lasers and external magnetic fields, the entrapment of the atoms can be finely tuned. The absorption frequency of the atoms can then be measured highly accurately. It was first proposed and realised by Hidetoshi Katori at the University of Tokyo, and since then, various research groups have improved upon it [14]. The most common elements used are Strontium and Ytterbium atoms. A recent optical lattice clock created by researchers at NIST demonstrated an inaccuracy of approximately 10-18, which at the time proved to be the most precise. A significant advantage of the optical lattice clock is its stability paired with its accuracy, such that the Strontium based clock is regarded as the second definition of the SI unit “second”. Many believe it will replace the primary definition in the coming years [14, 17]. The excitement surrounding this new clock is not unfounded. The 2022 Breakthrough Prize in fundamental physics was awarded to Hidetoshi Katori and Jun Ye (NIST / University of Colorado Boulder) for their significant work in optical lattice clocks — the very first winners from the field of photonics.
The second promising next-generation clock plays a tug of war with the optical lattice clock for the title of the world's most accurate clock. It is the quantum logic clock, the most precise clock ever to have been created at the time of writing. A quantum logic clock utilises the extremely stable vibration of a single Aluminium ion that has been trapped and lasercooled. These clocks utilise lasers in the optical frequency in order to cause the ion oscillation, which results in higher accuracy compared to Cesium based atomic clocks that utilise microwave frequencies (frequencies about 100,000 times less). However, manipulating the Aluminium ion using a laser has not proven to be easy. In order to overcome this hurdle, researchers at NIST made a breakthrough in 2005 when they used a partner Beryllium⁵ ion to cool the Aluminium ion and count its oscillations simultaneously [18-19].
One of the first quantum logic clocks made by NIST in 2010 caught vast media attention. It had a high enough accuracy to test time dilation proposed in Einstein's theory of general relativity with only 33 centimetres of height. They had demonstrated that time goes by quicker when you're higher off the ground, as well as that time moves slower when you're moving faster. It was one of the first realisations of Einstein's theory on a small, laboratory scale [20-21]. Future advancements in high precision clocks could lead to experiments investigating the intertwining effects between relativity and quantum mechanics, something that has stumped physicists for decades.
NIST's most recent quantum logic clock surpassed the optical lattice clock in terms of its accuracy (but not in stability, which is about ten times worse). The quantum logic clock does not gain or lose a second in 33 billion years, about twice the universe's age. It is the first clock to have an inaccuracy of less than 10⁻¹⁸ [22].
Both the optical lattice clock and the quantum logic clock are competing to become the next standard clock that defines a second. Though clocks are not often in the limelight, they are the bedrock of many technologies used every day. Hence, it is paramount to keep measuring the speed of time.
Figure 2: An egg carton-like potential traps atoms in its valleys as illustrated [15].
¹ Oscillations from resonant transitions in atoms had been known prior to the 20th century, but their detailed nature was not understood until the onset of quantum mechanics in the early 20th century. Lord Kelvin first suggested an atomic clock using Sodium and Hydrogen atoms in 1879.
² More specifically, atomic clocks use atoms cooled to near zero kelvin temperatures in order to access the bottom two energy levels of the atom. The transitions happen in those two isolated energy levels.
³ Note that here we are only stating the general principle of atomic clocks and that most sophisticated clocks are much more complex with their implementation and geometry.
⁴ An excellent video on how atomic clocks work can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8CI3bs9rvY
⁵ Magnesium is more common in recent implementations.
[1] Swenson, “NIST launches a new U.S. time standard: NIST-F2 Atomic Clock,” NIST, 08-Jan-2018. [Online]. Available: https:// www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2014/04/nist-launchesnew-us-time-standard-nist-f2-atomic-clock. [Accessed: 30- Apr-2022].
[2] Swenson, “Take F2: NIST's latest, most accurate time standard debuts,” NIST, 08-Jan-2018. [Online]. Available: https://www. nist.gov/news-events/news/2014/04/take-f2-nists-latestmost-accurate-time-standard-debuts. [Accessed: 30-Apr2022].
[3] Guinot, B. Is the International Atomic Time TAI a coordinate time or a proper time?. Celestial Mechanics 38, 155–161 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230427
[4] J. R. Vig, “Accurate Clocks and Their Applications,” Nov-2011. [Online]. Available: https://princetonacm.acm.org/downloads/ AccurateClocksVig.pdf. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[5] P. Delva, J. Lodewyck, S. Bilicki, E. Bookjans, G. Vallet, R. Le Targat, P.-E. Pottie, C. Guerlin, F. Meynadier, C. Le PoncinLafitte, O. Lopez, A. Amy-Klein, W.-K. Lee, N. Quintin, C. Lisdat, A. Al-Masoudi, S. Dörscher, C. Grebing, G. Grosche, A. Kuhl, S. Raupach, U. Sterr, I. R. Hill, R. Hobson, W. Bowden, J. Kronjäger, G. Marra, A. Rolland, F. N. Baynes, H. S. Margolis, and P. Gill, “Test of special relativity using a fiber network of optical clocks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 118, no. 22, 2017.
[6] T. Saidkhodjaev, J. Voas, R. Kuhn, J. DeFranco, and P. Laplante, “Aggregating atomic clocks for time-stamping,” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Service Oriented Systems Engineering (SOSE), 2020.
[7] Lombardi, M. , Heavner, T. and Jefferts, S. (2007), NIST Primary Frequency Standards and the Realization of the SI Second, Measure: The Journal of Measurement Science, [online], https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_ id=50602 (Accessed April 28, 2022)
[8] “Isidor Rabi—1944 Nobel Laureate in Physics,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings. [Online]. Available: https://www. mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)00080-2/ fulltext#relatedArticles. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[9] R. Merlin, "Rabi oscillations, Floquet states, Fermi's golden rule, and all that: Insights from an exactly solvable two-level model", American Journal of Physics 89, 26-34 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001897
[10] “How does an atomic clock work?,” How Do Atomic Clocks Work? [Online]. Available: https://www.timeanddate.com/ time/how-do-atomic-clocks-work.html. [Accessed: 30-Apr2022].
[11] Rodney Loudon Reviewed by Thomas von Foerster, "The Quantum Theory of Light", American Journal of Physics 42, 1041-1042 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1987930
[12] Sakurai, J., & Napolitano, J. (2017). Modern Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108499996
[13] “A concise summary of the international system of units, SI.” [Online]. Available: https://www.bipm.org/ documents/20126/41483022/SI-Brochure-9-concise-EN. pdf/2fda4656-e236-0fcb-3867-36ca74eea4e3?version=1.2&d ownload=false. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[14] “4.32 optical lattice clocks,” 4.32 Optical Lattice Clocks - PTB. de, 06-Apr-2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ptb.de/cms/ en/ptb/fachabteilungen/abt4/fb-43/ag-432.html. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[15] “Optical lattices: Webs of light,” NIST, 05-Apr-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/physics/what-are-opticallattices. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[16] Horiuchi, N. Ever-evolving optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 16, 4–5 (2022).
[17] G. E. Marti, R. B. Hutson, A. Goban, S. L. Campbell, N. Poli, and J. Ye, “Imaging Optical Frequencies with 100 μHz Precision and 1.1 μm Resolution,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, no. 10, 2018.
[18] “NIST's Quantum Logic Clock returns to top performance,” NIST, 15-Jul-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/ news-events/news/2019/07/nists-quantum-logic-clockreturns-top-performance. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[19] “NIST's second 'quantum logic clock' based on aluminium ion is now world's most precise clock,” NIST, 21-Mar-2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/02/ nists-second-quantum-logic-clock-based-aluminum-ion-nowworlds-most-precise. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[20] C. W. Chou, D. B. Hume, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, “Optical clocks and relativity,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5999, pp. 1630–1633, 2010.
[21] “NIST pair of aluminium atomic clocks reveal Einstein's relativity at a personal scale,” NIST, 14-Feb-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/ nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativitypersonal-scale. [Accessed: 30-Apr-2022].
[22] S. M. Brewer, J.-S. Chen, A. M. Hankin, E. R. Clements, C. W. Chou, D. J. Wineland, D. B. Hume, and D. R. Leibrandt, “27Al+ Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below 10^−18,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 123, no. 3, 2019.
Alex Chapple - MSc, Physics
Alex is a Master's student in the Department of Physics. He likes pretzels and churros.